sinocare CGM Sensor Covers, Waterproof, Continuous Glucose Monitor Protection, a Pack of 10 Pieces

We have been using the Sinocare CGM for about 6 months now since DX. It has a very acceptable MARD (Mean Absolute Relative Difference). I find it very reliable and easy to use.

Faulty applicator, unreliable readings and zero customer service. I’d love to be able to recommend this Continuous Glucose Monitor as a suitable rival to the market leader. Unfortunately, the applicator mechanism is awkward and too frequently fails.Once triggered, the unit cannot be re-applied if the mechanism jams or fails - leading to hugely expensive frustration and waste.The manufacturer does not respond to requests for replacement or refund, either by email or via their product app. This is simply not good enough. Avoid.Edit (July 2025): After a significant delay, I was eventually sent a replacement. Unfortunately, this also failed after 10 days’ use. It literally fell off my abdomen! These continuous applicator fails are disturbing and potentially dangerous.

This is a blood sugar monitor with an Android or iOS App which automatically takes blood sugar measurements every two or three minutes.It’s similar to a well-known monitor which is available on NHS Prescription and so is free of charge throughout the UK with the exception of England where normal prescription charges will apply. The monitor is readily available to Type 1 and 3C diabetics. So if you have that type of diabetes you should speak to your GP before purchasing this product. If you have Type 2 this product might be worth investing in. However, you’ll need to pay around £105 a month for a supply of monitors. I’d certainly recommend as a one-off test to see if you have significant BS variation which might justify ongoing monitoring.The monitor and app work as expected. It can be positioned on the arm or stomach - whereas for the NHS-supplied monitor should be applied to the arm only. The iCan monitor is probably more secure when attached to the stomach and easier to disguise. There’s more risk of knocking a monitor attached to the arm. Other differences are minor. The monitor takes two hours once attached before supplying blood sugar results whereas it’s only an hour for the NHS kit. The iCan lasts for 15 days, after which it will stop providing readings. The NHS device lasts for only 14 days.For diabetics wanting a better grasp of blood sugar levels this sort of technology is a game changer. It means no more finger prick tests except where reported BS rates look highly abnormal. The constant readings give a far better of how BS varies over time, something not possible via finger pricks.So I recommend the technology for all diabetics. This device works as expected, and in a very similar way to an NHS-supplied monitor. I’d compare prices and support with the market leader before deciding to go with the iCan.A strong four stars.

Fast delivery

I am a nurse and have been using CGMs to monitor for hypoglycemia and was interested in Sinocare as a more affordable option for myself. Unfortunately, I found the ICAN extremely unreliable and to confirm this I stimulated a Mixed Meal Postprandial Hypoglycemia Test whilst simultaneously wearing two different CGM types - ICAN and Dexcom for comparison [this involved fasting from 10pm, then drinking ensure at 9am, with an additional blood glucose taken every 30 minutes over a 5 hour period from 9am-3pm during which only water allowed]. I compared the readings from blood glucose finger prick (sinocare gold AQ meter), ICAN and Dexcom in a graph. The Dexcom and the fingerstick were very closely aligned between 4-6mmol throughout, however, the ICAN was consistently above this range giving readings with a difference as big as 2.6mmol e.g. when my meter read 4.5 and the ICAN seemed to think I was 7.1 despite levels being stable without rapid changes [note: it is not expected to be identical as there is a lag between blood glucose and interstitial glucose, but the trends will still correlate and the readings should be fairly close together when levels are stable which was the case here]. Additionally, the ICAN doesn't allow for self calibration which could have resolved this issue and not having this option makes the device more unreliable. The company states that "calibration is not required because it is calibrated in the factory", however, many medical devices require regular calibration and worth noting that self calibration is possible with other CGM's brands on the market. Advise you save your time, money, and more importantly, your health, as the cost of a mistake in blood glucose readings is far too dangerous. The positive reviews I read on amazon appear to be from those who did not compare readings to a glucose meter. The app does have a nice layout, though this is somewhat irrelevant given the poor quality of the data.

Having used Libre several times I thought I'd give this a try given it's a bit cheaper. The instructions were okay, got it attached well and the app was very good. One drawback is the mandatory alerts you can't switch off. I don't want to be nagged if I'm just using it for awareness. If you turn off notifications (Android) it just pesters you to turn them back on. This would be easy to fix. Generally accuracy over 8 days was better than the LIbre, and faithfully recorded a reading every 3 minutes to the app. By comparison, Libre often disconnected and reported "when it felt like it."So how accurate is it? Well for me I found it almost spot-on, about 5 or 10 minutes behind the a regular fingerprick test. YMMV but this is a lot more accurate (for me) than the LIbre was.Sadly, it packed in on Day 8 and reported a malfunction and had to be removed.Within a day or two the manufacturer got in touch and they offered to refund me but by then I'd already returned it to Amazon.Took a while to hear from them but it's reassuring to know that their customer service will respond.I think I'll try them again.