BougeRV Yuma 100W Compact CIGS Thin-Film Flexible Solar Panel, The Most Flexible Solar Panel with Tape for Easy Installation (Compact Version)

I added this panel to my roof solar on my trailer. It's in series with two similar panels. I like it so much that I just bought another to replace one old one on the roof. It installed very easily and you can walk on it so I don't have to do a tightrope walk on my roof between panels. It is expensive but worth it.

Rooftop rv roofs. Will work for a zero maintenance effort. Is exactly what you need for rv roofs. With lots of variables where a house roof is 10x better for solar and rv aren’t. 2 years on my rv still powers my lights fridge and cooking with 2x100 ah 12v lithium batteries. Crazy good. Also San Diego weather.

These are excellent solar panels for a motorhome. They work great in low light levels. I replaced all of the standard rigid solar panels with Bouge and was able to double my output because of better use of space. I was able to go from about 400W to 800W rated output. Three 200W Bouge with adhesive strips and two 100W Sunpower. Installed them about two years ago and so far all is well.

With all the reviews of regular flexible panels only lasting 3 years at best we decided to spend the extra money and give these a try. It’s been almost a year and they are still just as efficient as the day we mounted them.We went with the ones with the adhesive because we didn’t want to drill any holes in my wife’s Ursa Minor camper top so these worked out perfectly.The install was super easy. We just cleaned the surface of the camper top. Peeled off the adhesive cover, lined up the panels and stuck them down to the roof. (Still holding strong)We installed 300 watts (three panels) on the roof and they fit perfectly. We have them hooked to the Bluetti AC200MAX and on a good day of sun they pull in about 255 watts per hour of solar. They also seem pretty efficient in partial shade and in overcast conditions.Overall we are happy with our purchase and would buy again if we had the need for more solar.

First of all this panel is great. But that was short lived. I run a 200 amh battery system. I used this to keep it charged all the time and while using my bouge rv fridge. Anyhow I be had it about 7 months on the top of my truck. Well went on a 100 mile trip camping and once I got to my destination I looked up and it was gone wires ripped out of my charge controller which is bouge rv. Luckily I have two more 169 watt solar suitcases which I use once set up for all my electronics I run. So now I’m out 300.00 the tape did not hold. Will I buy another yes but not for awhile since it is expensive so I’ll have to save for it. Like I said it’s the best panel I’ve had collects sun even in shade just really wish the tape held. I’ll say if you get one you’ll love it just make sure before trips that it stuck on good. I’ll add extra tape on the next one

I was ok until it was gone.

I'm unfamiliar with standard or expected efficiency loss when solar panels are not mounted precisely perpendicular to the sun, but these panels seem to perform poorly under non-ideal conditions.62 degree clear day in Phoenix, AZ - Sun at 37.7 degree altitude during daily median:Out of 200w max output (which the panel does produce when mounted precisely perpendicular), output is hardly 80 watts! When mounted within 15 degrees of perpendicular output still doesn't push past 120w.Also, partial shade and shady conditions cut output even further - a benefit of these is supposed to be improved output during these conditions, but I can't imagine a "standard" panel producing less than 20% of rated.Perhaps the above is typical for all - I'm not (yet) an expert - if so, disregard my ignorant complaints here!An off-axis correct factor would be great to have as part of the product specs, then the consumer could know what to expect in various conditions.

Good output, even on cloudy days!